Re: [PATCH 08/10] netfilter: ipset: Introduce RCU in all set types instead of rwlock per set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:01:39PM +0100, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > 
> > I don't see why you'd need a special function otherwise, unless you
> > want some explicit documentation as to where you're changing/updating
> > content of structures protected by rcu.  But, in those sections you
> > already need to hold some type of lock, so I don't think its needed.
> 
> Hm, you are both right - I clean up this part as it's totally unnecessary, 
> these are not pointers, even indirectly.

Thanks.

Please, I'd appreciate if you send smaller batches for nf-next for
easier review. So instead of large batches, more frequent pull
requests if possible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux