On 4 November 2014 15:44, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:56:58PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: >> On 4 November 2014 14:37, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > I think this needs to be: >> > >> > % nft add rule nat prerouting redirect [port] [nat_flags] >> > >> >> The port and nat_flags arguments are mutually exclusives. That's why I >> used the [port|nat_flags] syntax. > > iptables allows this: > > -j REDIRECT --to-ports 8000-8010 --random Then, should I change the behaviour of the nft redirect parser? The code in my patch doesn't allow that. I think it makes no sense: "redirect to this port; no sorry, redirect to a random one." -- Arturo Borrero González -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
