On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 09:31 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:22:36 +0100 > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:05:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ] > > > Can any of the netfilter folks give me an Acked-by for this? > > If Florian's concern were addressed, then: > Yeah, the change he mentioned was done is 3/8. As that was written by > Joe Perches, I did some work that he missed and put it before his > patch, which showed a discrepancy between the two functions. After all > patches are applied, it should be consistent to his liking. I think seq_has_overflowed does not need to be used after every seq_<put/print> call. It interrupts reading code flow and just isn't alll that necessary as every operation before it will be redone anyway. It should be used before or after a large blocks though. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
