Re: ipset: bad timeout assignments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:32:45AM +0200, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Vitezslav Samel wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 01:04:03PM +0200, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Vitezslav Samel wrote:
> > > 
> > > >   I'm using ipset's hash:ip with timeout to ban bad behaving clients.
> > > > When using very long timeout ( > 2147483 ) the ipset's timeout gets
> > > > weird:
> > > > 
> > > > -- TEST 1 ----------------
> > > > + uname -r
> > > > 3.15.6
> > > > + ipset --version
> > > > ipset v6.23, protocol version: 6
> > > > + ipset create test hash:ip timeout 1111111
> > > > + ipset add test 10.0.0.1
> > > > + ipset add test 10.0.0.2 timeout 2000000
> > > > + ipset add test 10.0.0.3 timeout 3000000
> > > > + ipset list test
> > > > Name: test
> > > > Type: hash:ip
> > > > Revision: 3
> > > > Header: family inet hashsize 1024 maxelem 65536 timeout 1111111
> > > > Size in memory: 16720
> > > > References: 0
> > > > Members:
> > > > 10.0.0.1 timeout 1111111
> > > > 10.0.0.2 timeout 2000000
> > > > 10.0.0.3 timeout 4294967
> > > > + ipset destroy test
> > > > --------------------------
> > > > 
> > > > The 10.0.0.3 gets 4294967 timeout although I wanted timeout 3000000.
> > > > 
> > > > With hash:ip default timeout being >2147483 the test looks like this:
> > > > 
> > > > -- TEST 2 ----------------
> > > > + ipset create test2 hash:ip timeout 3333333
> > > > + ipset add test2 10.0.0.1
> > > > + ipset add test2 10.0.0.2 timeout 2000000
> > > > + ipset add test2 10.0.0.3 timeout 3000000
> > > > + ipset list test2
> > > > Name: test2
> > > > Type: hash:ip
> > > > Revision: 3
> > > > Header: family inet hashsize 1024 maxelem 65536 timeout 3333333
> > > > Size in memory: 16720
> > > > References: 0
> > > > Members:
> > > > 10.0.0.1 timeout 4294967
> > > > 10.0.0.2 timeout 2000000
> > > > 10.0.0.3 timeout 4294967
> > > > + ipset destroy test2
> > > > --------------------------
> > > > 
> > > > Now 10.0.0.1 gets wrong timeout and 10.0.0.3 also.
> > > > The magic number 2147483 is (UINT_MAX/1000)/2 which makes me think this
> > > > is some signed/unsigned int problem somewhere.
> > > > 
> > > > The above tests were run on x86_64 machine; the same problem is on i686,
> > > > but wrongly assigned timeout is 2147483 instead of 4294967.
> > > > 
> > > > I also tried 3.16.2 kernel, but the bug is here too.
> > > 
> > > Too large jiffies are converted automatically to MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET (i.e. 
> > > ((LONG_MAX >> 1)-1)). That's a limitation in the kernel which cannot be 
> > > worked around. The only thing I could do is not to accept too large 
> > > timeout values.
> > 
> >   Even on machines with 64-bit long? That is weird.
> 
> I have re-checked and it is so: time values are stored in unsigned int 
> (see msecs_to_jiffies), so the maximal value in seconds is UINT_MAX/1000.
> However, msecs_to_jiffies limits it further by checking negative values, 
> which halves the maximal value.
> 
> So this is beyond ipset itself. All I can do is to correct in the "ipset" 
> library what is the accepted maximal timeout value and change it from the 
> current UINT_MAX/1000 to (UINT_MAX/1000)/2.

  OK. So for me and other users the only solution to this problem is to
wait if you try to make some other way to specify the timeout greater
than (UINT_MAX/1000)/2 (i.e. about 24 days for current archs) - either
using u64 variables or something other.

	Thank you very much,

		Vita Samel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux