On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:35:44PM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > El 29/09/2014 17:02, "Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió: > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:34:48PM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > > @@ -66,6 +67,8 @@ static struct nft_set *set_parse_file(const char > *file, uint16_t format) > > > } > > > > > > nft_parse_err_free(err); > > > + > > > + nft_set_attr_set_u32(s, NFT_SET_ATTR_ID, 1); > > > return s; > > > > > > } > > > > I guess this works if you parse one single set definition in a file. > > With more than one set, this will break. > > > > IIRC, Alvaro started a patch time ago to add a new interface to > > libnftnl to handle the set internal id which was incomplete. > > > > Cc'ing him to know its status. > > Yes, there is a issue here. But this code example just parse one set. Right. Then applied, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
