Re: [PATCH nf-next 2/2] netfilter: masquerading needs to be independent of x_tables in Kconfig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11 September 2014 18:02, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Users are starting to test nf_tables with no x_tables support. Therefore,
> masquerading needs to be indenpendent of it from Kconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi, my original intention was to nest the masquerade config under
NF_NAT_IPV[4|6].

I see now that I got confused between NF_NAT_IPV4 / IP_NF_NAT, and so on.

Thanks for the fixes.
-- 
Arturo Borrero González
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux