On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:07:21PM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > This patch adds masquerade support to nft_nat. > > Note that enum nf_nat_manip_type is replaced by enum nft_nat_types in order > to support masquerade. Is it really worth combining them? We have lots of code churn to move them into a single module, and static NAT and masquerading have some fundamental differences in the data they need, so now we're adding new code to validate all of this, we're adding a new NAT type which is actually not a new NAT type but simply a special case of SNAT etc. Why not simply create a new masquerade expression? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
