From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx> There's actually no good reason why we cannot use cgroup id 0, so lets just remove this artificial barrier. Reported-by: Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c b/net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c index f4e8330..7198d66 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static int cgroup_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) if (info->invert & ~1) return -EINVAL; - return info->id ? 0 : -EINVAL; + return 0; } static bool -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
