Ken-ichirou MATSUZAWA <chamaken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry for lack of explanation. > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 01:41:54PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > > So, if only ct2 has attr: > > nfct_get_attr_u16(ct1, ATTR_ZONE) -> returns 0 > > nfct_get_attr_u16(ct2, ATTR_ZONE) -> returns the zone id > > > > ct1 and ct2 would be equal if ct2 zone is 0. > > And nfct_cmp(ct1, ct2, NFCT_CMP_MASK) is expected to return > true if ct2 zone is not 0. You're right. I think your patch is the right thing to do. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html