From: Behan Webster
> On 03/18/14 02:41, David Laight wrote:
> > From: behanw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> From: Mark Charlebois <charlebm@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Replaced non-standard C use of Variable Length Arrays In Structs (VLAIS) in
> >> xt_repldata.h with a C99 compliant flexible array member and then calculated
> >> offsets to the other struct members. These other members aren't referenced by
> >> name in this code, however this patch maintains the same memory layout and
> >> padding as was previously accomplished using VLAIS.
> >>
> >> Had the original structure been ordered differently, with the entries VLA at
> >> the end, then it could have been a flexible member, and this patch would have
> >> been a lot simpler. However since the data stored in this structure is
> >> ultimately exported to userspace, the order of this structure can't be changed.
> > Why not just remove the last element and allocate space for it after the
> > structure?
> Because that would still be employing VLAIS to solve the problem. The
> last element may be a zero-length array (a flexible member), not a VLA.
> Sadly both the last 2 elements in the struct need to be manually
> calculated, which is what we've done.
So make the last element a 'flexible member' and then work out where
the final field goes.
Something like:
struct p {
struct a a;
struct b b[];
} p = malloc(sizeof *p + n * sizeof (struct b) + alignof (struct c)
+ sizeof (struct c);
struct c *c = (void *)&p->b[n] + (-offsetof(struct p, b[n]) & (alignof(struct c) - 1);
David
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�����n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
