Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: don't release a conntrack with non-zero refcnt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 01:46:37PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 12:29:25AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> > > > index 4d1fb5d..356bef5 100644
> > > > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> > > > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> > > > @@ -448,7 +448,9 @@ nf_conntrack_hash_check_insert(struct nf_conn *ct)
> > > >  			goto out;
> > > >  
> > > >  	add_timer(&ct->timeout);
> > > > -	nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general);
> > > > +	smp_wmb();
> > > > +	/* The caller holds a reference to this object */
> > > > +	atomic_set(&ct->ct_general.use, 2);
> > > 
> > > What happens when the skb is dropped before confirmation?
> > 
> > If you refer to the spot above, conntracks added via ctnetlink are
> > always confirmed and the refcount will become 1 after insertion into
> > the hashes. In the packet path, the refcount is 1 for unconfirmed
> > conntracks,
> 
> Right, sorry.  I missed this.  You only want to delay the init-to-1
> until the conntrack is inserted into the unconfirmed list.
> 
> However, I think there is still a problem with the atomic_set to 2
> above.
> 
> What about e.g.
> Prerouting -> set refcnt to 1
> (clone)
> (clone)
> (refcnt is 3)
> forward/postrouting -> confirmation (refcnt reset to two)
>
> I think this could happen at least with netfilter on-top-of bridge
> when dealing with e.g. udp mcast. (i am looking at br_forward and
> deliver_clone in particular).
> 
> I think you could just leave hash_check_insert() alone?

hash_check_insert() is only used by ctnetlink in the creation path for
new conntracks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux