Hello,
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> If a fwmark is passed to ip_vs_conn_new(), it is passed in
> vaddr, not daddr. Therefore we should set AF to AF_UNSPEC in
> vaddr assignment (like we do in ip_vs_ct_in_get()), otherwise we
> may copy only first 4 bytes of an IPv6 address into cp->daddr.
>
> v2: fix messed up {d,v}addr and p->{d,v}addr, add info about the
> outcome (thanks to Julian Anastasov)
>
> Signed-off-by: Bogdano Arendartchuk <barendartchuk@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Looks like problem comes from
commit be8be9eccbf2d908a7e56b3f7a71105cd88da06b
"ipvs: Fix IPv4 FWMARK virtual services" (2.6.30).
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> index 59a1a85..a8eb0a8 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> @@ -871,11 +871,11 @@ ip_vs_conn_new(const struct ip_vs_conn_param *p,
> cp->protocol = p->protocol;
> ip_vs_addr_set(p->af, &cp->caddr, p->caddr);
> cp->cport = p->cport;
> - ip_vs_addr_set(p->af, &cp->vaddr, p->vaddr);
> - cp->vport = p->vport;
> - /* proto should only be IPPROTO_IP if d_addr is a fwmark */
> + /* proto should only be IPPROTO_IP if p->vaddr is a fwmark */
> ip_vs_addr_set(p->protocol == IPPROTO_IP ? AF_UNSPEC : p->af,
> - &cp->daddr, daddr);
> + &cp->vaddr, p->vaddr);
> + cp->vport = p->vport;
> + ip_vs_addr_set(p->af, &cp->daddr, daddr);
> cp->dport = dport;
> cp->flags = flags;
> cp->fwmark = fwmark;
> --
> 1.8.1.4
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
