From: Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxxxxx>
The test on verdict was simply done on the value of the verdict
which is not correct as far as queue is concern. In fact, the test
of verdict test must be done with respect to the verdict mask for
verdicts which are not internal to nftables.
Signed-off-by: Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c
index cb9e685..e8fcc34 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ next_rule:
break;
}
- switch (data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict) {
+ switch (data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict & NF_VERDICT_MASK) {
case NF_ACCEPT:
case NF_DROP:
case NF_QUEUE:
@@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ next_rule:
nft_trace_packet(pkt, chain, rulenum, NFT_TRACE_RULE);
return data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict;
+ }
+
+ switch (data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict) {
case NFT_JUMP:
if (unlikely(pkt->skb->nf_trace))
nft_trace_packet(pkt, chain, rulenum, NFT_TRACE_RULE);
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
