Re: [PATCH v2 -next] netfilter: don't use per-destination incrementing ports in nat random mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:17:59PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_nat.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_nat.h
> > index bf0cc37..1ad3659 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_nat.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_nat.h
> 
> This is exposed to userspace.
> 
> > @@ -4,10 +4,14 @@
> >  #include <linux/netfilter.h>
> >  #include <linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tuple_common.h>
> >  
> > -#define NF_NAT_RANGE_MAP_IPS		1
> > -#define NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED	2
> > -#define NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM	4
> > -#define NF_NAT_RANGE_PERSISTENT		8
> > +#define NF_NAT_RANGE_MAP_IPS			(1 << 0)
> > +#define NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED		(1 << 1)
> > +#define NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM		(1 << 2)
> > +#define NF_NAT_RANGE_PERSISTENT			(1 << 3)
> > +#define NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM_FULLY		(1 << 4)
> 
> So you cannot change it. It would break old iptables binaries.

There are no semantic changes besides the addition of
NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM_FULLY. Otherwise just the notation is changed,
which looks sane to me.

> BTW, please send me the userspace part.

Daniel has the patch ready, I think he will submit it later today.

Thanks,

  Hannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux