Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >This is a bit backwards, I think. > >- We gather frags > >- Then we invoke ip6t_do_table for each individual fragment > > > >So basically your patch is equivalent to > >for_each_frag( ) > > ip6t_do_table(reassembled_skb) > > > >Which makes no sense to me - why traverse the ruleset n times with the same > >packet? > > Because each fragment need to be pushed through separately. Why? AFAIU we only need to ensure that (in forwarding case) we send out the original fragments instead of the reassembled packet. > What different approach would you suggest? I am sure that current behaviour is intentional, so I'd first like to understand WHY this was implemented this way. Also, this would change very long standing behaviour so one might argue that this is a no-go anyway. What is the exact problem that this is supposed to solve? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
