On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:14:53PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 06:18:13PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 17:57 +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > Hi Pablo, > > > > > > > > > We also need fixes for net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c and > > > > net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c as well. Could you extend this patch > > > > and resend? > > > > > > Sure, I can try, but that's going to require a bit of time to sit down and > > > look at the shared data, access order, dependencies etc. I'm currently > > > preparing for Edinburgh, so it might be a while before I get a chance to > > > extend this. > > > > That's basically same code copy/pasted, so it should be relatively easy. > > Ok, I took a look and I think I see what you mean: there are just some > additional consumers of the tables, so there aren't any additional writers > afaict (at least, net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c uses rw locks so we don't > have an issue there). > > Attempt at an updated patch below. Applied, thanks Will. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
