From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:43:02 +0300 > I see the following two alternatives for applying these > patches: > > 1. Linger patch 2 in net-next to avoid surprises in the upcoming > release. In this case patch 3 can be reworked not to depend on > the new rt6_nexthop() definition in patch 2. I guess this is a > better option, so that patch 2 can be reviewed and tested for > longer time. > > 2. Include all 3 patches in net tree - more risky because this > is my first attempt to change IPv6. I have decided to merge all three patches into -net right now. I've reviewed these patches several times and they look good to me. I'll let them cook upstream for at least a week before submitting them to -stable to let any last minute errors show themselves and subsequently get resolved. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
