[PATCH 2/3] net: sched: Use dev_net() instead of the direct access to ->nd_net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We have to use dev_net() instead of the direct access to ->nd_net,
otherwise compilation fails if NET_NS is not enabled. Reported by
the kbuild test robot.

Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/sched/em_ipset.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/em_ipset.c b/net/sched/em_ipset.c
index 1ac41d3..527aeb7 100644
--- a/net/sched/em_ipset.c
+++ b/net/sched/em_ipset.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static int em_ipset_change(struct tcf_proto *tp, void *data, int data_len,
 {
 	struct xt_set_info *set = data;
 	ip_set_id_t index;
-	struct net *net = qdisc_dev(tp->q)->nd_net;
+	struct net *net = dev_net(qdisc_dev(tp->q));
 
 	if (data_len != sizeof(*set))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static void em_ipset_destroy(struct tcf_proto *p, struct tcf_ematch *em)
 {
 	const struct xt_set_info *set = (const void *) em->data;
 	if (set) {
-		ip_set_nfnl_put(qdisc_dev(p->q)->nd_net, set->index);
+		ip_set_nfnl_put(dev_net(qdisc_dev(p->q)), set->index);
 		kfree((void *) em->data);
 	}
 }
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux