Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:41:01PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > > Hrm, I think a better option is to not compare the expectation timeout > > in the first place. I think the timeout is an irrelevant meta detail; > > if the actual expectations are identical, nfexp_cmp should say so even > > if they happen to have different timeouts. > > That's fine with me, we don't have any requirement for such feature at > this moment. So just skip it. Probably adding a short comment in the > code would be a good idea as placeholder. Perfect! I've pushed all three patches, with ATTR_TIMEOUT compare replaced by a comment. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
