Re: [RFC 2/2] netfilter: nf_tables: improvements for the existing transaction approach

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 03:00:43PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> * One transaction comes in one batch packet composed of several
>   netlink messages from user-space.
> 
> * All rule updates are handled as transactions.
> 
> * No need for explicit begin, commit and abort commands.

We seem to need an explicit commit operation, we still have to support
iptables-restore -t, in that case the rule-set update is not applied.
This is supported with the current approach but this RFC does not
cover that case.  I'm going to give it another try to re-spin to this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux