On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 05:43 +0000, Cong Wang wrote: > On Thu, 09 May 2013 at 03:04 GMT, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > +#if 0 > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nf_conntrack_locks); i++) > > + arch_spin_lock_init(&nf_conntrack_locks[i]); > > +#endif > > + > > Is this intentional? What do you think ? Apparently arch_spin_lock_init() does not exist (but for ia64) kernel/lglock.c simply relies on storage being cleared. nf_conntrack_locks[] being cleared, we do not have to init it. But I do not really like this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
