On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 10:48 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Don't get me wrong, I am not opposing cond_resched_rcu_lock() because it > will be difficult to validate. For one thing, until there are a lot of > them, manual inspection is quite possible. So feel free to apply my > Acked-by to the patch. One question : If some thread(s) is(are) calling rcu_barrier() and waiting we exit from rcu_read_lock() section, is need_resched() enough for allowing to break the section ? If not, maybe we should not test need_resched() at all. rcu_read_unlock(); cond_resched(); rcu_read_lock(); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
