On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote: > On 10.04.2013 13:26, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:40:24PM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote: > >>On 09.04.2013 11:54, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>>On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote: > >>>>Hello, > >>>> > >>>>I noticed there's quite new DNAT, SNAT, NETMAP support for > >>>>ip6tables, but that information is missing in the man page. > >>>>Anything else needed than just copying the according ipv4 *.man files? > >>>>If so, want me do prepare a patch? > >>> > >>>I guess you can rename the ipv4 specific man files to xt_... and > >>>update them accordingly, the modules should behave similar to their > >>>IPv4 counterparts. > >>> > >> > >>Ok, here it is. > >>I slightly modified the text in regards to sentence structure. > >>Removed the references to older kernels, as this does not apply to > >>the new ipv6 version. > >>Added the list of valid protocols, which again - for me leaves the > >>question about -p icmp open (re other mail). > > [...] > >>--- > >> extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man | 9 +++++++++ > >> extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_DNAT.man > >> create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_NETMAP.man > >> create mode 100644 extensions/libip6t_SNAT.man > > > >Well, my suggestion was to add one manpage which covers both the IPv4 > >and IPv6 targets since they're pretty much identical. I think just > >adding a libxt_DNAT.man etc. should work. > > I've not yet tried to figure out where and what code is responsible > for assembling all the *.man files together, but from what I see as > the result and from what is there, like the LOG or MASQUERADE target > are split up that way, actually producing redundant sections. Thats > why I thought thats the way to go. Will try the libxt_*.man way... Thanks, > As there's redundant stuff, I can also prepare patches to join that > together. Wanted? I guess that would make sense if the IPv4 and IPv6 parts are (nearly) identical. > What about the -p icmp part? Not sure, I'd leave it as it is for now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
