Hello.
On 29-03-2013 8:11, Simon Horman wrote:
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
After commit 70e7341673 (ipv4: Show that ip_send_reply()
is purely unicast routine.) we do not need to reroute DNAT-ed
traffic over loopback because reply uses iph daddr and not
rt_spec_dst.
Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Signed-off by: Hans Schillstrom <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c | 58 ++-------------------------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c
index 6448a2e..c942d36 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c
[...]
@@ -635,16 +597,8 @@ ip_vs_nat_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,
/* drop old route */
skb_dst_drop(skb);
skb_dst_set(skb, &rt->dst);
- } else {
+ } else
{} should be kept after *else*, according to Documentation/CodingStyle,
chapter 3.
ip_rt_put(rt);
- /*
- * Some IPv4 replies get local address from routes,
- * not from iph, so while we DNAT after routing
- * we need this second input/output route.
- */
- if (!__ip_vs_reroute_locally(skb))
- goto tx_error;
- }
IP_VS_DBG_PKT(10, AF_INET, pp, skb, 0, "After DNAT");
@@ -1269,16 +1223,8 @@ ip_vs_icmp_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,
/* drop the old route when skb is not shared */
skb_dst_drop(skb);
skb_dst_set(skb, &rt->dst);
- } else {
+ } else
Same here.
ip_rt_put(rt);
- /*
- * Some IPv4 replies get local address from routes,
- * not from iph, so while we DNAT after routing
- * we need this second input/output route.
- */
- if (!__ip_vs_reroute_locally(skb))
- goto tx_error;
- }
/* Another hack: avoid icmp_send in ip_fragment */
skb->local_df = 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
