Hi Pablo,
On 2013/03/26 19:48, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:37:50PM +0900, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao wrote:
Hi Michael,
Do you see any problem with these two patches?
Please, hold on with the second patch.
Are you Ok with getting patch 1 merged while be discuss
what to do about the issue that the second patch tried to
document? Could I get your "Acked-by" for it?
I'd like to find a possible solution for the EPERM problem that we've
been discussing. It requires some rework and performance evaluation.
The problem is that there is a huge installed base of
systems that show this broken behaviour, so even if
we find a proper fix for it we still should document
which systems may be affected by the spurious EPERM
bug, thus giving application programmers a chance to
add logic to their programs to recover from such
eventualities.
Regards,
Fernando
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
