On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 03:52:40PM +0900, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote: > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] man/send(2): document a long standing bug that can cause spurious EPERM errors > > This bug has been known since early 2009 (the latest) and discussed in > netdev before: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&w=2&r=1&s=Possible+race+condition+in+conntracking+&q=b > > It seems that a proper fix would be non trivial, so document the bug > in the meantime. > > Reported-by: Hirotaka Sasaki <sasaki.hirotaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > diff -urNp man-pages-3.50-orig/man2/send.2 man-pages-3.50/man2/send.2 > --- man-pages-3.50-orig/man2/send.2 2013-03-19 15:18:03.784306647 +0900 > +++ man-pages-3.50/man2/send.2 2013-03-19 15:30:40.788060426 +0900 > @@ -420,6 +420,11 @@ Linux may return > .B EPIPE > instead of > .BR ENOTCONN . > + > +Linux may return spurious > +.B EPERM > +errors when netfilter's conntrack module is loaded and two or more > +UDP packets belonging to the same connection are processed in parallel. The Connection tracking system may drop packets for different reasons under rare circunstances, not only in this case. I'd prefer if you only apply patch 1/2. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
