Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: sctp: fix checksumming on snat and dnat handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	Hello,

On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Daniel Borkmann wrote:

> In our test lab, we have a simple SCTP client connecting to a SCTP
> server via an IPVS load balancer. On some machines, load balancing
> works, but on others the initial handshake just fails, thus no
> SCTP connection whatsoever can be established!
> 
> We observed that the SCTP INIT-ACK handshake reply from the IPVS
> machine to the client had a correct IP checksum, but corrupt SCTP
> checksum when forwarded, thus on the client-side the packet was
> dropped and an intial handshake retriggered until all attempts
> run into the void.
> 
> To fix this issue, this patch i) adds a missing CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY
> after the full checksum (re-)calculation (as done in IPVS TCP and UDP
> code as well), ii) calculates the checksum in little-endian format
> (as fixed with the SCTP code in commit 4458f04c: sctp: Clean up sctp
> checksumming code) and iii) refactors duplicate checksum code into a
> common function. Tested by myself.
> 
> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>

	Looks good to me. Simon, please apply as bugfix.
It seems we have this problem from day 1 (2.6.34).

Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>

> ---
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> index 746048b..ae8ec6f 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -61,14 +61,27 @@ sctp_conn_schedule(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd,
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> +static void sctp_nat_csum(struct sk_buff *skb, sctp_sctphdr_t *sctph,
> +			  unsigned int sctphoff)
> +{
> +	__u32 crc32;
> +	struct sk_buff *iter;
> +
> +	crc32 = sctp_start_cksum((__u8 *)sctph, skb_headlen(skb) - sctphoff);
> +	skb_walk_frags(skb, iter)
> +		crc32 = sctp_update_cksum((u8 *) iter->data,
> +					  skb_headlen(iter), crc32);
> +	sctph->checksum = sctp_end_cksum(crc32);
> +
> +	skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>  		  struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct ip_vs_iphdr *iph)
>  {
>  	sctp_sctphdr_t *sctph;
>  	unsigned int sctphoff = iph->len;
> -	struct sk_buff *iter;
> -	__be32 crc32;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
>  	if (cp->af == AF_INET6 && iph->fragoffs)
> @@ -92,13 +105,7 @@ sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>  	sctph = (void *) skb_network_header(skb) + sctphoff;
>  	sctph->source = cp->vport;
>  
> -	/* Calculate the checksum */
> -	crc32 = sctp_start_cksum((u8 *) sctph, skb_headlen(skb) - sctphoff);
> -	skb_walk_frags(skb, iter)
> -		crc32 = sctp_update_cksum((u8 *) iter->data, skb_headlen(iter),
> -				          crc32);
> -	crc32 = sctp_end_cksum(crc32);
> -	sctph->checksum = crc32;
> +	sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
>  
>  	return 1;
>  }
> @@ -109,8 +116,6 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>  {
>  	sctp_sctphdr_t *sctph;
>  	unsigned int sctphoff = iph->len;
> -	struct sk_buff *iter;
> -	__be32 crc32;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
>  	if (cp->af == AF_INET6 && iph->fragoffs)
> @@ -134,13 +139,7 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>  	sctph = (void *) skb_network_header(skb) + sctphoff;
>  	sctph->dest = cp->dport;
>  
> -	/* Calculate the checksum */
> -	crc32 = sctp_start_cksum((u8 *) sctph, skb_headlen(skb) - sctphoff);
> -	skb_walk_frags(skb, iter)
> -		crc32 = sctp_update_cksum((u8 *) iter->data, skb_headlen(iter),
> -					  crc32);
> -	crc32 = sctp_end_cksum(crc32);
> -	sctph->checksum = crc32;
> +	sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
>  
>  	return 1;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.1

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux