Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] netfilter: ip6t_NPT: Fix checksuming.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From my side, apply yoshofuji patches and my
onces complement patch, that worked for me ;)

I can do some more testing tomorrow with different
addresses and ranges if nobody else finds time...

Cheers
 Ulrich


On 01/31/13 11:04, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
Hi,

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:42:39PM +0100, Ulrich Weber wrote:
Hi Yoshofuji,

thanks for your patches! If I add a onces complement
to the return value of csum_fold() it works for my setup.
Any consensus on the fix for this? I'd like to have some solution into
3.8-rc.

Thanks.

On 01/26/13 19:37, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
Cast __wsum from/to __sum16 is wrong.  Instead, apply appropriate
conversion function: csum_unfold() or csum_fold().

Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_NPT.c |    6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_NPT.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_NPT.c
index 7302b0b..3ff281b 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_NPT.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_NPT.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static int ip6t_npt_checkentry(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
  				(__force __wsum)npt->dst_pfx.in6.s6_addr16[i]);
  	}
- npt->adjustment = (__force __sum16) csum_sub(src_sum, dst_sum);
+	npt->adjustment = csum_fold(csum_sub(src_sum, dst_sum));
  	return 0;
  }
@@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ static bool ip6t_npt_map_pfx(const struct ip6t_npt_tginfo *npt,
  			return false;
  	}
- sum = (__force __sum16) csum_add((__force __wsum)addr->s6_addr16[idx],
-			 npt->adjustment);
+	sum = csum_fold(csum_add(csum_unfold((__force __sum16)addr->s6_addr16[idx]),
+				 csum_unfold(npt->adjustment)));
  	if (sum == CSUM_MANGLED_0)
  		sum = 0;
  	*(__force __sum16 *)&addr->s6_addr16[idx] = sum;
 From 40e0c6d86514a8dcc80f18fbe8a2945c6ee78f6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ulrich Weber <ulrich.weber@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:24:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: ip6t_NTP: Use onces complement of csum_fold

we need a 16bit value but not folded

Signed-off-by: Ulrich Weber <ulrich.weber@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_NPT.c |    6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_NPT.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_NPT.c
index 74e171d..61a9b95 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_NPT.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_NPT.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static int ip6t_npt_checkentry(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
  	src_sum = csum_partial(&npt->src_pfx.in6, sizeof(npt->src_pfx.in6), 0);
  	dst_sum = csum_partial(&npt->dst_pfx.in6, sizeof(npt->dst_pfx.in6), 0);
- npt->adjustment = csum_fold(csum_sub(src_sum, dst_sum));
+	npt->adjustment = ~csum_fold(csum_sub(src_sum, dst_sum));
  	return 0;
  }
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ static bool ip6t_npt_map_pfx(const struct ip6t_npt_tginfo *npt,
  			return false;
  	}
- sum = csum_fold(csum_add(csum_unfold((__force __sum16)addr->s6_addr16[idx]),
-				 csum_unfold(npt->adjustment)));
+	sum = ~csum_fold(csum_add(csum_unfold((__force __sum16)addr->s6_addr16[idx]),
+				  csum_unfold(npt->adjustment)));
  	if (sum == CSUM_MANGLED_0)
  		sum = 0;
  	*(__force __sum16 *)&addr->s6_addr16[idx] = sum;
--
1.7.9.5


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux