Hi pablo, On 2013/01/21 09:08, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Hi Gao, > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:16:21PM +0800, Gao feng wrote: >> Right now,the netfilter initialize and cleanup codes are >> in pernet operations function. >> This job should be done in module_init/exit.We can't use >> init_net to identify if it's the right time to initialize >> or cleanup. > > nf-next$ patch -p1 < /tmp/RESEND-01-10-netfilter-move-nf_conntrack-initialize-out-of-pernet-operations.patch > patching file include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h > patching file net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1334 (offset 3 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 1350 (offset 3 lines). > Hunk #3 FAILED at 1368. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 1383 (offset 4 lines). > Hunk #5 succeeded at 1473 (offset 4 lines). > Hunk #6 succeeded at 1521 (offset 4 lines). > Hunk #7 succeeded at 1538 (offset 4 lines). > Hunk #8 FAILED at 1588. > Hunk #9 succeeded at 1627 (offset 12 lines). > 2 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c.rej > patching file net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c > > What tree have you used to rebase your patches? Please, use nf-next as > base. I used the last net-next tree. Get it,I will rebase this patchset base on nf-next. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html