On 2013/01/11 00:41, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > First off, thanks for looking into this. > > I want to get this fix into 3.8 and -stable but this patch includes a > rework whose scope is net-next (upcoming 3.9). > > The attached patch aims to fix the issue according to your patch > description. Once this is in, we can revisit your code refactoring > proposal. > > Let me know. > Yes,I'm happy this bug being fixed in 3.8. So what I should do is waiting for below patch being accepted and then rebase my patchset? It's OK. Thanks! > > 0001-netfilter-nf_conntrack-fix-BUG_ON-while-removing-nf_.patch > > >>From a211bd666fbfe17ae7171a50ad92fedc7b9e19fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:12:01 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix BUG_ON while removing > nf_conntrack with netns > > canqun zhang reported that we're hitting BUG_ON in the > nf_conntrack_destroy path when calling kfree_skb while > rmmod'ing the nf_conntrack module. > > Currently, the nf_ct_destroy hook is being set to NULL in the > destroy path of conntrack.init_net. However, this is a problem > since init_net may be destroyed before any other existing netns > (we cannot assume any specific ordering while releasing existing > netns according to what I read in recent emails). > > Thanks to Gao feng for initial patch to address this issue. > > Reported-by: canqun zhang <canqunzhang@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Acked-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
