Re: [PATCH 19/19] netfilter: gre: fix resource leak when unregister gre proto

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/07/13 10:59, Gao feng wrote:
> On 01/07/13 10:38, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:15:17AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>> Hi Gao,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:27:37AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>>>> Hi Pablo,
>>>>
>>>> On 01/05/13 11:50, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>>> Hi Gao,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:36:46AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>>>>>> Currectly we unregister proto before all conntrack entries of
>>>>>> this proto being destroyed. so in function destroy_conntrack
>>>>>> we can't find proper l4proto to call l4proto->destroy.
>>>>>> this will cause resource leak.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good catch.
>>>>>
>>>>> But better to remove the entries before unregistering the protocol
>>>>> tracker, so l4proto->destroy is always called.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think the reason we unregister proto before remove all entries
>>>> is to avoid new entry for this protocol being created.
>>>>
>>>> If we remove all contrack entries before unregistration, there maybe
>>>> some new entries being created between nf_ct_iterate_cleanup and
>>>> nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister_net.this will cause some terrible things.
>>>
>>> Leaks are less likely to happen, but may well still happen while
>>> racing with protocol removal, agreed.
>>>
>>>> SO I think we should make proto unavailable first,remove all entries next,
>>>> and remove proto from nf_ct_protos arrays finally.
>>>
>>> Your proposal adds a branch in the packet path to fix an issue that is
>>> specific of the GRE protocol tracker. In the current code, this fixes
>>> the memory leak while removing the nf_conntrack_proto_gre module,
>>> which is a rare operation.
>>>
>>> We have to come with a less intrusive solution.
>>
>> Wait. The existing code is calling nf_ct_gre_keymap_flush in
>> proto_gre_net_exit path, so those keymap objects are not leaked.
> 
> Agree, it looks like nf_ct_gre_keymap_flush is added to solve this
> problem.
> 
> Please ignore this patch.

I mean ignore the codes of gre part.
I still think nf_ct_iterate_cleanup doesn't make sure all entries being
destroyed.

I will resend this patch.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux