Re: tc ipt action

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 2012-12-15 22:19, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
> Example, the following should work for
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip u32 match u32 0 0
> action ipt -j CONNMARK \
> action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0

If I try that command (substituting ipt->xt and eth0->dummy0,
ifb0->dummy1), all I get is the dreaded "Invalid argument".
So the kernel rejected the command, which could indicate that
userspace construction might have been ok.

# tc filter add dev dummy0 parent ffff: protocol ip u32 match u32 0 0 \
action xt -j CONNMARK action mirred egress redirect dev dummy1

tablename: mangle hook: NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING
        target:  CONNMARK and 0x0 index 0
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
We have an error talking to the kernel

> Pablo, Hasan Chowdhury tells me this broke after iptable 1.4.10
> Hasan also sent me a small patch to fake "xt" instead of "ipt" - but i think
> there's more than meets the eye here; some interface we are using to talk to
> xtables on user space seems to have changed.

What was the last combination that worked?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux