On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:00:36PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Wednesday 2012-12-05 20:28, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > >Somehow, the first part of this email went missing. Not critical, > >but for completeness: > > > >These two patches each add an xtables match. > > > >The xt_priority match is a straighforward addition in the style of > >xt_mark, adding the option to filter on one more sk_buff field. I > >have an immediate application for this. The amount of code (in > >kernel + userspace) to add a single check proved quite large. > > Hm so yeah, can't we just place this in xt_mark.c? I don't feel this belongs to xt_mark at all. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
