Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter: add connlabel conntrack extension

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:55:12PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Changes since RFCv2:
> > - make it a variable-size extension and remove dynamic
> >   reallocation of the label array
> > - add ctnetlink support for receiving/setting labels
> > - limit to 128 instead of 1k labels due to limited extension
> >   space (128 is more than enough for now, so this is no problem).
> 
> At a quick glance I like this round, you got this simplified :-).
> 
> My only concern is that (if I'm not missing anything) it
> inconditionally add the extension even if we don't need it.

Its conditional:

words = ACCESS_ONCE(net->ct.label_words);
if (words == 0 || WARN_ON_ONCE(words > 8))
	return NULL;
cl_ext = nf_ct_ext_add_length(ct, NF_CT_EXT_LABELS, words * sizeof(long),..

xt_connlabel increases "label_words" to a non-zero
value based on the highest bit it saw so far.  So e.g. when bit 32 is
requested, a 32-bit machine kernel will set words to 2, and
a 64 bit kernel to 1, thus turning the extension on for new connections.

The only drawback is that when you add a connlabel rule for bits 127,
then for bit 1, then delete the first rule again words will be larger
than one.

But i think this ok (I don't want to add per-bit refcountr :-) )
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux