From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:54:19 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:25:37 +0800
>
>> ipv6: add a new namespace for nf_conntrack_reasm
>> ipv6: unify conntrack reassembly expire code with
>> ipv6: make ip6_frag_nqueues() and ip6_frag_mem() static
>> ipv6: unify fragment thresh handling code
>>
>> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> These changes look great, all applied to net-next, thanks.
I have to ask if you actually build tested this change at all:
net/ipv6/proc.c: In function ʽsockstat6_seq_showʼ:
net/ipv6/proc.c:46:10: error: implicit declaration of function ʽip6_frag_nqueuesʼ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
net/ipv6/proc.c:46:10: error: implicit declaration of function ʽip6_frag_memʼ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
It is absolutely impossible for you to have enabled ipv6 and not gotten
that build error.
The only logical explanation is that you didn't commit the changes
to net/ipv6/proc.c in your tree when you put together these patches.
Please fix this up and resubmit the full series.
Thanks.
?τθΊ{.nΗ+?·????+%?Λ?±ιέΆ??w?Ί{.nΗ+?·§zΧβ?Χ«ύΧ―z_β?Ψ^n?rʽφ¦zΛ?λh?¨θΪ&£ϋΰzΏδzΉή?ϊ+?Κ+zf£ʼ·h??§~??Ϋi??ο?κ??κηz_θ?ζj:+v?¨ώ)ί£ψm
