> On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Lutfi ODUNCUOGLU wrote: > >> I have two iptables configuration, for inet4 and inet6. In order to stop >> the >> iptables; >> >> ipset flush >> ipset destroy >> >> and for ip6tables >> >> ipset flush >> ipset destroy > > Unnecessary, the sets are already flushed and destroyed above. Why unnecessary? Can I need to only flush and destroy inet6 sets? If I can define them separetly, why not? Mostly iptables and ip6tables are different. They are handled separate. One can need to flush and destroy them, I think. thanks. > >> Can we make them just to flush and destroy inet6 or inet4? Is there any >> way? > > "ipset flush" flushes all sets, and "ipset destroy" destroys all sets, > both inet and inet6. > > Best regards, > Jozsef > - > E-mail : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlecsik.jozsef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt > Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of > Sciences > H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" > in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
