On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 02:00:31AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >This patch fixes __nf_ct_expect_check to return 0 in case that the
> >expectation timer refresh fails. If the expectation is dying, we have
> >to make sure that we don't re-insert it again in the list.
> >
> >This problem becomes more noticeable with permanent expectations, used
> >by the conntrack SIP helper.
> >
> >RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00b6ce2>] [<ffffffffa00b6ce2>] flush_expectations.clone.15+0x72/0x9b
> >[nf_conntrack_sip]
> >RSP: 0018:ffff88013fc03970 EFLAGS: 00010246
> >RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: dead000000100100 RCX: ffff88011aaced68
> >RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88013fc03950 RDI: ffff88009a411f78
> >RBP: ffff88013fc03990 R08: dead000000200200 R09: dead000000100100
> >R10: dead000000200200 R11: ffff88013fc03950 R12: ffff88013fc03a01
> >R13: 0000000000000001 R14: dead000000100100 R15: 0000000000000157
> >[...]
> >[<ffffffffa00b6e6a>] process_invite_response+0x66/0x6b [nf_conntrack_sip]
> >[<ffffffffa00b65a1>] process_sip_msg.clone.11+0x1db/0x236 [nf_conntrack_sip]
> >[<ffffffffa00b6e04>] ? process_update_response+0x6b/0x6b [nf_conntrack_sip]
> >[<ffffffffa00b68a6>] sip_help_udp+0x8c/0x97 [nf_conntrack_sip]
> >[<ffffffffa007aa15>] ipv4_confirm+0xab/0x19f [nf_conntrack_ipv4]
> >[<ffffffff812e54bc>] nf_iterate+0x43/0x78
> >
> >Reported-by: Rafal Fitt <rafalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> >net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c | 2 +-
> >1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
> >index 45cf602..ec8bb0d 100644
> >--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
> >+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
> >@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static inline int __nf_ct_expect_check(struct nf_conntrack_expect *expect)
> > hlist_for_each_entry(i, n, &net->ct.expect_hash[h], hnode) {
> > if (expect_matches(i, expect)) {
> > /* Refresh timer: if it's dying, ignore.. */
> >- if (refresh_timer(i)) {
> >+ if (!refresh_timer(i)) {
> > ret = 0;
> > goto out;
> > }
>
> Actually that also doesn't look correct. If we managed to refresh
> the timer (indicated by return value 1), there's nothing left to do
> and we exit without an error. If the expectation is indeed dying
> (indicated by return value 0), we continue looking for an alive
> expectation and if none is found, we try to insert the new one. This
> basically covers the rare condition that an expectation is dying at
> the exact moment where a matching one is reinstated.
You're right.
> This can't be the problem though, the dying expectation won't vanish
> while the SIP helper is walking the list since its using RCU for
> destruction, and the SIP helper will ignore it since the timer can't
> be deleted twice.
Yes, I had the same impression by looking at the code, still the dump
(attached to this email) shows a list corruption while iterating.
> Is this problem reproducable and are there dumps showing what exactly
> is happening?
It's not reproducible (or at least, we don't manage to reproduce it).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
