On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > Because this or that way, someone would scratch his/her head. For example > if the rule contains "in/out" and the list:set is a mixed one, contains > both hash:net,iface and other types of sets. They'll ask: "What the heck > is "in/out" for say hash:ip type of set?" Let me cite again our own words: A letter is missing, which may easily lead to misunderstanding, in spite of the prefix before the next citation. So the corrected sentence is: > ....... Let me cite again your own words: > You:> Simpler for whom? It can't be for the end user, because referring > You:> to, say, destination IP address as "out" IP address is even more > You:> ridiculous than using 'src' and 'dst' designators for network > You:> interfaces. Quite astonishing that! > > So we circled again. Shortcut the next round: > > Send your patches according to solution a, that is the "in/out" keywords > are allowed only with hash:net,iface type of sets alone and rejected with > a proper error message when attempted to use with any other set type. Best regards, Jozsef - E-mail : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlecsik.jozsef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
