On Saturday 2012-07-14 16:49, Aft nix wrote: >>> > @David: just to put you into context. Jan is proposing to merge >>> > xt_SYSRQ into mainstream, we are discussing if it would be better to >>> > make it out of it (so people do not depend on the firewalling >>> > utilities to get it working) based on a different proposal described >>> > above. > >Hi Jan, > >I don't know if it goes to main line kernel eventually, i want this feature >right now. Right now i have to physically go the office rack to reboot in a >case of kernel crash. Office IT people don't provide IPKVM stuffs in development >servers, they only give it to "production" severs. > >I really think its nice touch. Is it available in xtable-addons, or i >just apply your patch directly? It is in Xt-a, and I try to upstream it. Again, I emphasize that xt_SYSRQ can be combined with other matches of Xtables, and that why it should be merged rather than a separate subsystem of some kind. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
