We want this ;-) On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Monday 2012-07-09 19:28, Josh Hunt wrote: >>> I held it off; this is now all merged. >> >> Awesome, thanks! >> >> I know this just got accepted to xtables-addons, but I was wondering what the >> process is to possibly get this merged into Linus' tree? > > You send the files that are in xtables-addons to whoever is taking care > of the Linux kernel business (currently that seems to be Pablo), of course > in a form that is acceptable for the Linux kernel (i.e. minus xtables-addons > lines). > >>I know I've seen some things go from xtables-addons to his tree, >>xt_TEE comes to mind. Is tarpitting (the concept) something that >>would be accepted? > > It certainly seems well-desired by $users. And normally, inclusion > is to follow demand (that's how squashfs got in, IIRC). Expect > to defend your case when making it upstream. Solicit more "we want > this opinions" :) > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
