with your patches in some cases
"src,in" == "src,src" or "src,in" != "src,src"
Could you provide me with an example please? I am intrigued!
This is ridiculous, as if I haven't provided it countless times:
iptables -A INPUT -m set --match-set list1 src,src -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -m set --match-set list1 src,in -j ACCEPT
Well, in the above example I fail to see where "src,in" == "src,src" -
that is *never* the case!
So, in other words, what you are actually getting at, is that you wish to
restrict the use of 'in' and 'out' options only for hash:net,iface types
because you are not happy with the use of 'in'/'out' in any other set types,
list:set in particular? Have I understood this correctly then?
That's a possible - probably the simplest - solution. It's OK for me.
So, let me get this straight then: you wish 'in' and 'out' to be
accepted as input (and I presume also displayed as well) *only* for
hash:net,iface type of sets and rejected (possibly with an error)
everywhere else?
In other words:
1. For hash:net,iface the possible options should be 'in', 'out', 'src'
and 'dst'; and
2. For all other sets, including list:set the only available options
should be 'src' and 'dst'. Have I understood this correctly then?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html