On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:20:49PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:02:05PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > > > partially reverts commit 54b07dca68557b0952585b5f4834cd0dd86eba35 > > > (netfilter: provide config option to disable ancient procfs parts). > > > > > > Problem is that this also disabled net/stat/nf_conntrack, which > > > is useful for diagnosing certain conntrack-related issues; and there > > > are currently no other means to obtain these statistics from userspace. > > > > > > (conntrack-tools "conntrack -S" uses the proc interface, too...) > > > > I can pass the following patch to David. It implements the missing > > code in ctnetlink to dump the statistics. Thus, conntrack doesn't use > > any /proc interface anymore (the changes to conntrack still pending). > > Thanks, that would be fine, too. > > > If you're OK with it, I'll integrate this in a backward compatible way > > (first try to use netlink, if not available, use /proc). > > Sounds good. JFYI: http://git.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=conntrack-tools.git;a=commit;h=8062d7fa6e0744a47c33ef0d3e17cc80ed005486 http://git.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=conntrack-tools.git;a=commit;h=d3fa4f391fb40414a5c1cea16faac65d2c66a75c I've pushed those two patches to the ct-stats branch to support dumping statistics via ctnetlink. I'll merge them once we hit 3.6-rc1. Part of that code can be moved to the libraries, we can do that later. BTW, you require git tree snapshot from libnetfilter_conntrack for this. And the -S output format is not backward compatible to previous: cpu=0 searched=9367 found=428234 new=287508 invalid=1 ignore=4 delete=291546 delete_list=6045 insert=2007 insert_failed=0 drop=0 early_drop=0 error=0 search_restart=0 cpu=1 searched=394 found=40745 new=1667 invalid=0 ignore=0 delete=378 delete_list=378 insert=1667 insert_failed=0 drop=0 early_drop=0 error=0 search_restart=0 cpu=2 searched=336 found=77297 new=2127 invalid=0 ignore=1 delete=661 delete_list=661 insert=2128 insert_failed=0 drop=0 early_drop=0 error=0 search_restart=0 cpu=3 searched=71 found=15016 new=1391 invalid=0 ignore=0 delete=87 delete_list=87 insert=1391 insert_failed=0 drop=0 early_drop=0 error=0 search_restart=0 > > Still, I think that passing this to current may be useful. Although > > you can workaround this by enable that option. What do you prefer? > > Ignore my patch. In the meantime people can NF_CONNTRACK_PROCFS=y; > we just have to wait a bit (e.g. a year) before killing the nfct > proc code completely. Makes sense. I'll pass my patch to David, drop this and extend the time to kill that /proc code for some time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html