On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:36:41PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> Now, nf_proto_net's users is confusing.
> we should regard it as the refcount for l4proto's per-net data,
> because maybe there are two l4protos use the same per-net data.
>
> so increment pn->users when nf_conntrack_l4proto_register
> success, and decrement it for nf_conntrack_l4_unregister case.
>
> because nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv[4|6] don't use the same per-net
> data,so we don't need to add a refcnt for their per-net data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
> index 9d6b6ab..63612e6 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
[...]
> @@ -458,23 +446,32 @@ int nf_conntrack_l4proto_register(struct net *net,
> struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = NULL;
>
> if (l4proto->init_net) {
> ret = l4proto->init_net(net, l4proto->l3proto);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> - ret = nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(net, l4proto);
> + pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net, l4proto);
> + if (pn == NULL)
> + goto out;
Same thing here, we're leaking memory allocated by l4proto->init_net.
> + ret = nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
>
> if (net == &init_net) {
> ret = nf_conntrack_l4proto_register_net(l4proto);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, l4proto);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
> + goto out;
Better replace the two lines above by:
goto out_register_net;
and then...
> + }
> }
>
> + pn->users++;
out_register_net:
nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
> +out:
> return ret;
I think that this change is similar to patch 1/1, I think you should
send it as a separated patch.
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_l4proto_register);
> @@ -499,10 +496,18 @@ nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister_net(struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
> void nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister(struct net *net,
> struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
> {
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = NULL;
> +
> if (net == &init_net)
> nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister_net(l4proto);
>
> - nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, l4proto);
> + pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net, l4proto);
> + if (pn == NULL)
> + return;
> +
> + pn->users--;
> + nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
> +
> /* Remove all contrack entries for this protocol */
> rtnl_lock();
> nf_ct_iterate_cleanup(net, kill_l4proto, l4proto);
> @@ -514,11 +519,15 @@ int nf_conntrack_proto_init(struct net *net)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> int err;
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net,
> + &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
> +
> err = nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic.init_net(net,
> nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic.l3proto);
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
> err = nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(net,
> + pn,
> &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
> @@ -528,13 +537,20 @@ int nf_conntrack_proto_init(struct net *net)
> rcu_assign_pointer(nf_ct_l3protos[i],
> &nf_conntrack_l3proto_generic);
> }
> +
> + pn->users++;
> return 0;
> }
>
> void nf_conntrack_proto_fini(struct net *net)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net,
> + &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
> +
> + pn->users--;
> nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net,
> + pn,
> &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
> if (net == &init_net) {
> /* free l3proto protocol tables */
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
