On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:28:33AM +0800, Gao feng wrote: > 于 2012年05月25日 14:02, Gao feng 写道: > > 于 2012年05月25日 10:54, Pablo Neira Ayuso 写道: [...] > >> Could you resolve this by checking pn->ctl_compat_header != NULL ? > > > > pn->ctl_table_header and ctl_compat_header is shared by l4proto_tcp and l4proto_tcp6. > > if we both register l4proto_tcp and l4proto_tcp6, when unregister l4proto_tcp6 > > pn->ctl_compat_header must not be NULL. > > > > Maybe we can resolve this by nf_conntrack_l4proto.l3proto == AF_INET && pn->ctl_compat_header != NULL > Because compat sysctl is registered by AF_INET's proto only. OK, as soon as it can remove the compat field, I prefer it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
