Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote on 05/23/2012 01:24:56 PM: > > > Maybe this needs a check for ESRCH and return back to hook_slow > > to work correctly? If this is the case, I can submit a patch to > > fix this, and piggy-back ESRCH for fail-open too. > > The idea for queue-bypass was to free the original (gso) skb > if we were able to queue at least one packet, i.e. the original > skb only continues traversal if queue bypassing is enabled > and no single segment could be queued. > > If it is a requirement for you that any remaining segments > that could not be queued continue traversal, then yes, > the existing code won't work for you. Yes, all segments need to be processed for this option. I will check if it is possible to do any code-sharing, and post the patches tomorrow with your other feedback incorporated. Thanks for your review, - KK -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
