[PATCH 3/7] netfilter: xt_HMARK: modulus is expensive for hash calculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Use:

((u64)(HASH_VAL * HASH_SIZE)) >> 32

as suggested by David S. Miller.

Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c b/net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c
index 5817d03..0a96a43 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ hmark_hash(struct hmark_tuple *t, const struct xt_hmark_info *info)
 	hash = jhash_3words(t->src, t->dst, t->uports.v32, info->hashrnd);
 	hash = hash ^ (t->proto & info->proto_mask);
 
-	return (hash % info->hmodulus) + info->hoffset;
+	return (((u64)hash * info->hmodulus) >> 32) + info->hoffset;
 }
 
 static void
-- 
1.7.10

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux