>---- Original Message ---- >From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> >To: "Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Cc: "Jozsef Kadlecsik" <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Hans Schillstrom" <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@xxxxxxx>, "kaber@xxxxxxxxx" <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, "jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx" <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>, "netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx" <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>, "hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Mon, May 14, 2012, 9:14 PM >Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: xt_HMARK: endian bugs > >On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 21:02 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > >> IIRC, Hans wants that, in case you have a cluster composed of system >> with different endianess, the hash mark calculated will be the same >> in both systems. To ensure that the distribution is consistent with >> independency of the endianess. > >Then jhash() must be audited to make sure its output is OK with this >requirement. I'm preparing test on mips & ppc right now to verify that as a first step. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
