Re: [PATCH 1/6] netfilter: sanity checks on NFPROTO_NUMPROTO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Mon, 14 May 2012 16:42:35 +0200,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:56:34PM +0100, Alban Crequy wrote:
> > With the NFPROTO_* constants introduced by commit 7e9c6e
> > ("netfilter: Introduce NFPROTO_* constants"), it is too easy to
> > confuse PF_* and NFPROTO_* constants in new protocols.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
> > <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Vincent Sanders
> > <vincent.sanders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
> >  net/netfilter/core.c |    5 +++++
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
> > index e1b7e05..4f16552 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/core.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
> > @@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ int nf_register_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
> >  	struct nf_hook_ops *elem;
> >  	int err;
> >  
> > +	if (reg->pf >= NFPROTO_NUMPROTO || reg->hooknum >=
> > NF_MAX_HOOKS) {
> > +		BUG();
> > +		return 1;
> 
> nf_register_hook returns a negative value on error. -EINVAL can be
> fine.

Is it the patch you mean? Do you want me to do a series repost?


From: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

netfilter: sanity checks on NFPROTO_NUMPROTO

With the NFPROTO_* constants introduced by commit 7e9c6e ("netfilter: Introduce
NFPROTO_* constants"), it is too easy to confuse PF_* and NFPROTO_* constants
in new protocols.

Signed-off-by: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Sanders <vincent.sanders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/netfilter/core.c |    5 +++++
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
index e1b7e05..ac56c5b 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
@@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ int nf_register_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
 	struct nf_hook_ops *elem;
 	int err;
 
+	if (reg->pf >= NFPROTO_NUMPROTO || reg->hooknum >= NF_MAX_HOOKS) {
+		WARN();
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&nf_hook_mutex);
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
-- 
1.7.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux