Re: [PATCH 2/2] IPVS: make failure of netns init more stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	Hello,

On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Hans Schillstrom wrote:

> > 	But I see some inconsistency in net/core/net_namespace.c:
> > __register_pernet_operations when CONFIG_NET_NS is enabled
> > does not call ops_free after failed ops_init while when
> > CONFIG_NET_NS is not enabled ops_free is called. The 
> > problem is that we leak the ops->size data allocated for the
> > failed net. I think, the fix should be ops_init to free the data.
> 
> Are you sure ?
> In my code it does... 
> 
> static int __register_pernet_operations(struct list_head *list,
> 					struct pernet_operations *ops)
> at line 417
> ..
> 		for_each_net(net) {
> 			error = ops_init(ops, net);
> 			if (error)
> 				goto out_undo;

	There is line here that registers current net for
cleanup only after ops_init success:

	list_add_tail(&net->exit_list, &net_exit_list);

	If ops_init fails for first net then net_exit_list will
be empty.

> ...
> line 426
> out_undo:
> 	/* If I have an error cleanup all namespaces I initialized */
> 	list_del(&ops->list);
> 	ops_exit_list(ops, &net_exit_list);
> 	ops_free_list(ops, &net_exit_list);
> 	return error;
> }

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux