Hi Dave, On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 06:02:29PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > I'm not pulling this. > > If I pull from your "corrected" URL, "git://1984.lsi.us.es/net-next nf-next" > it starts to download 17937 objects. Which means it's going to bring in all > of your -next work as well as my net-next tree upon which it is based, not > just this one bug fix. > > These mistakes should never happen in the first place. > > If you actually use "git request-pull" to generate the pull request > email body, you can NEVER get the URL wrong, GIT enforces it to be > correct and it enforces that the changes in your local tree are > present at the remote URL as well. You caught me here, I wasn't using git request-pull. I'll do next time, sorry. > You can't make these kinds of errors and oversights when you want to > ask me to pull in bug fixes at the very last minute when Linus is > about to make a final release. I think there's a misunderstanding. This is not intended for current 3.2-rc7. This is a fix for something that is in your net-next tree (upcoming 3.3). I can wait and resubmit this later, we have the entire 3.3-rc cycle to get it fixed. Sorry for rushing you. > Just toss these fixes, if they are so important submit them to Greg KH > and the -stable branch after 3.2.0-final goes out. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
